One thing is listening to the clips produced by others and totally another thing to actually use the tool and see how quick and how close you can arrive to your desired result. Yet, u picked the Noiseash file as ur favorite in a blind shootout that included an actual hardware unit too. Man, you praised this sontec version as a phenomenal one of a kind breakthrough of the decade in the plugin world, but u picked Crave in blind A/B, however, back in a Noiseash thread, you bashed the hell out of their neve version as being nowhere close to where it suppose to be or being even remotely close to a hardware behavior There is a reason that this version is the only one Burgess himself has ever collaborated or approved.hi Loji can we use this in a quote thank you. (same trick gets used on the hardware to make choruses sound Bigger, etc.) ie: flip the low shelf from 50 to 100, you get a different tone even set at 0dB. I don't like the sound with everything set flat, and the tone can change in non intuitive ways. The MH Sontec (IMO) nails what the hardware does. IK sounds a bit cleaner than the hardware in my experience. IK is better, the curves match the hardware correctly, but the hardware sounds more open. plus its bugs, chirps, and CPU consumption issues it might sound good subjectively on some program material, but it's not what a Sontec sounds like. Scarlet is poor (IMO) technically there is ripple in the response at 44.1, making it not match the hardware. I've been lucky enough to own or use about 6x different 430/432 series Sontecs over the years does the same tricks as the real hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |